

How should SysML be applied to a MBSE project? Question Variant(s): What are SysML best practices? What are SysML antipatterns (worst practices)? How is SysML properly used? How is SysML commonly abused? What is a good MBSE + SysML example?Īs SysML emerges as the de facto standard for Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) approaches, several SysML usage modes of progressive rigor have become evident: Whereas Activity, Sequence and State Machine diagrams are Turing Complete, and their dynamic behavior can be simulated or executed, Use Cases diagrams are not Turing Complete and are not simulatable. *: Although Use Case diagrams are generally classified as Behavior diagrams by both the OMG SysML and UML 2 specifications their Behavioral semantics are ambiguous and incomplete. When properly defined and applied Parametric diagrams are capable of Mathematical ModSim no other SysML or UML 2 diagrams are capable of this. Mathematical ModSim, Mathematical M&S, Parametric Simulation) refers to the capability of a computer program to execute the a mathematical model of the behavior of a system of interest, where the model is defined as a set of mathematical equations. ‡: Mathematical Modeling & Simulation (a.k.a.

In general, with the exception of Use Case diagrams, SysML and UML 2 Behavior diagrams are potentially capable of Dynamic System Simulation. Dynamic System Simulation) refers to the capability of a computer program to execute the time-varying behavior of a system of interest. The SysML is composed of nine (9) diagram types and Allocation Tables for mapping language elements across diagram types: DIAGRAM PROPERTIES For more information about the current version of OMG SysML see the SysML FAQ: What is the current version of SysML?. The SysML was adapted and adopted by the Object Management Group (OMG) as OMG SysML in 2006. The SysML was originally created by the SysML Partners' SysML Open Source Specification Project in 2003.
